Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mosbacher v. United States, 1940 — 311 U.S. 619 · caselaw · US
General
Mosbacher v. United States
311 U.S. 619·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 128.
Mosbacher v. United States.
November 18, 1940.
Messrs. Mark Eisner and Ferdinand Tannenbaum for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Mr. Sewall Key for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is reversed, and. the cause is remanded to the Court of Claims for further proceedings. Neuberger v. Commissioner of Interned Revenue, ante, p. 83.