Contracts · MBE-tested
Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. et al. v. Societe Purfina Maritime
318 U.S. 781·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 789.
Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. et al. v. Societe Purfina Maritime.
April 5, 1943.
Messrs. John W. Crandall, Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr., Arch E. Ekdale, and Martin J. Weil for petitioners. Messrs. T. Catesby Jones and Farnham P. Griffiths for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.