Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Moor et al. v. County of Alameda et al.; Coffee-Rich, Inc., et al. v. Fielder, Director of Agriculture, et al.; Culpepper v. United States; Gardner v. McCarthy, Facility Superintendent; Black et al. v. Illinois; King v. California; House v. St. Agnes Hospital, Inc., et al.; Shoemaker v. Dwyer et al.; Wheeler v. United States; Mendes v. Brotherhood of Railway & Airline Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, AFL-CIO-CLC, et al.; Jaynes v. Jaynes et al., 1973 — 412 U.S. 963 · caselaw · US