Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HOME MORTGAGE COMPANY and First National Bank of Durham, a Corporation, Petitioners, v. Margaret M. RAMSEY, Respondent, 1930 — 51 F.2d 1078 · caselaw · US
Corporations
HOME MORTGAGE COMPANY and First National Bank of Durham, a Corporation, Petitioners, v. Margaret M. RAMSEY, Respondent
51 F.2d 1078·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HOME MORTGAGE COMPANY and First National Bank of Durham, a Corporation, Petitioners, v. Margaret M. RAMSEY, Respondent.
No. 3115.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Nov. 25, 1930.
For opinion on merits, see 49 F.(2d) 738.
See, also, 47 F.(2d) 621.
Jones Fuller, of Durham, N. C., and Allen Wardwell, of New.York City, for petitioners.
R. Clarence Dozier, of South Mills, N. C., and R. Palmer Ingram, of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Application for stay of proceedings denied, provided, etc. Order filed.