Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eugene M. Thayer, Plaintiff in Error, v. Eliza M. Schaben et al., 1912 — 223 U.S. 714 · caselaw · US
General
Eugene M. Thayer, Plaintiff in Error, v. Eliza M. Schaben et al.
223 U.S. 714·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 65.
Eugene M. Thayer, Plaintiff in Error, v. Eliza M. Schaben et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
Argued for the plaintiff in error January 19, 1912.
Decided January 22, 1912.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Mr. Charles H. Pegler, Mr. Arthur J. Eddy and Mr. Emil C. Wetten for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Fred S. Jackson for the defendants in error.
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. California National Bank v. Thomas, 171 U. S. 441; Appleby v. Buffalo, 221 U. S. 524, 529.