Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James L. Reynolds, Appellant, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Respondent, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 592 · caselaw · US
General
James L. Reynolds, Appellant, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Respondent
164 N.Y. 592·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James L. Reynolds, Appellant, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Respondent.
Reynolds v, City of Mount Vernon, 26 App. Div. 581, affirmed.
(Submitted October 17, 1900;
decided November 2, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made March 22, 1898, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granting a new trial.
Isaac N. Mills for appellant.
William J. Mcurshall for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting : Parker, Ch. J., and Bartlett, J. Not sitting: Cullen, J.