General
Nathalie E. Baylies, Respondent, v. Schuyler V. C. Hamilton et al., Respondents. Alexander Schuyler Hamilton and Beatrice Ray Hamilton, Appellants
165 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nathalie E. Baylies, Respondent, v. Schuyler V. C. Hamilton et al., Respondents. Alexander Schuyler Hamilton and Beatrice Ray Hamilton, Appellants.
Baylies v. Hamilton, 36 App. Div. 133, affirmed.
(Argued December 5, 1900;
decided January 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 2, 1899, modifying, and affirming as modified, interlocutory and final judgments entered in an action for the partition of certain real property upon the report of a referee.
Lewis L. Delafield and George W. Ellis for appellants.
George E. P. Howard and David J. Gallert for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on the prevailing opinion below, with costs to each party appearing by separate attorneys upon this appeal, payable out of the proceeds of the sale.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.