Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Borgfeldt & Co., Appellant, v. George B. Wood et al., Respondents, 1898 — 154 N.Y. 784 · caselaw · US
General
George Borgfeldt & Co., Appellant, v. George B. Wood et al., Respondents
154 N.Y. 784·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Borgfeldt & Co., Appellant, v. George B. Wood et al., Respondents.
Borgfeldt v. Wood, 92 Hun, 260, affirmed.
(Argued December 16, 1897;
decided January 11, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 15, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
James Dunne and Charles E. Ide, for appellant.
Charles W. Andrews for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.