Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COX & CARPENTER, Inc., et al. v. LITTLE, 1931 — 53 F.2d 84 · caselaw · US
General
COX & CARPENTER, Inc., et al. v. LITTLE
53 F.2d 84·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COX & CARPENTER, Inc., et al. v. LITTLE.
No. 6385.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 27, 1931.
Hollis C. Rawls, of Columbia, Miss., for appellants.
S. C. Mize and R. W. Thompson, Jr., both of Gulfport, Miss., for appellee.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER; and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that the separate appeals in this case were taken in open court on April 3 and April 22, 1931, respectively, and that appeal bonds required on said appeals were not presented and approved until July 24, 1931, more than three months after final judgment in the ease, this court is without jurisdiction of the appeals, and they are accordingly dismissed. Jackson v. Norris (C. C. A.) 37 F.(2d) 511; Vaughan v. American Insurance Co. (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 526. '