Torts · MBE-tested
James H. Aken, Respondent, v. Barnet & Aufsesser Knitting Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James H. Aken, Respondent, v. Barnet & Aufsesser Knitting Company, Appellant.
Aken v. Barnet & Aufsesser Knitting Co., 118 App. Div. 463, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 4, 1907, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.
Murray Downs for appellant.
Daniel C. McElwain and James H. Berns for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.