Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.; and Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp., 1951 — 340 U.S. 928 · caselaw · US
General
Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.; and Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.
340 U.S. 928·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 442.
No. 443.
Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.; and Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.
John Minor Wisdom for petitioners. /. Blanc Monroe, Monte M. Lemann, Walter J. Suthon, Jr. and Robert G. Polack for respondents. Solicitor General Perlman filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 184 F. 2d 11.