Administrative
Eliza Merwin, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant
113 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eliza Merwin, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 19, 1889;
decided May 3, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 22, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, andan order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edward S. Rapallo for appellant.
Thomas P. Wickes for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.