Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Borum v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin et al., 1961 — 368 U.S. 926 · caselaw · US
General
Borum v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin et al.
368 U.S. 926·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 440.
Borum v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin et al.
Max Raskin for petitioner. John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Mortimer Levitan, Assistant Attorney General, for Industrial Comm/n of Wisconsin, and Alfred E. LaFrance for American Motors Corp., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Certiorari denied.