General
Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc., et al.
386 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 789.
Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc., et al.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner and James Mcl. Henderson for petitioner. Edward F. Howrey, Terrence C. Sheehy. and George W. Mead for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of certio-rari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows: “1, Whether a supplier’s granting to a retailer who buys directly from.it promotional allowances that are not made available to a wholesaler who resells to retailers competing with the direct-buying retailer violates Section 2 (d) of thé Robinson-Patman Act.”