Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Shelton et al. v. McKinley et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 958 · caselaw · US
General
Shelton et al. v. McKinley et al.
362 U.S. 958·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 541.
Shelton et al. v. McKinley et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 361 U. S. 947.) The joint motion to substitute John E. Fox as a party appellee in the place of Ralph Mitchell, Jr., and to name Charles V. Kalkbrenner as a party appellee instead of J. C. Langley is granted. The motion to substitute Everett Tucker, Jr., as President of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock Special School District, and J. H. Cottrell, B. F. Mackey and W. C. McDonald as parties appellee in the place of Ed I. McKinley, Jr., Ben D. Rowland and Robert W. Laster is granted. J. R. Booker for appellants, and Louis L. Ramsay, Jr. for appellees, on the joint motion. Robert L. Carter for appellants, on the motion to substitute Tucker et al. for McKinley et al.