Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harry KLAG, Jr., Trustee of Charles Mayers, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Samuel TEITZ and Myer Caplan, Appellees, 1932 — 61 F.2d 296 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Harry KLAG, Jr., Trustee of Charles Mayers, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Samuel TEITZ and Myer Caplan, Appellees
61 F.2d 296·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry KLAG, Jr., Trustee of Charles Mayers, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Samuel TEITZ and Myer Caplan, Appellees.
No. 4791.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
July 1, 1932.
William J. Connor, of Trenton, N. J., for appellant.
I. Herbert Levy and Forman & Levy, all of Trenton, N. J., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Finding no error in the court below holding that the landlord was entitled to preference for rent, the judgment below (1 F. Supp. 320) is affirmed.