Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sunil DEO, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA., 2020 — 140 S. Ct. 1243 · caselaw · US
General
Sunil DEO, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.
140 S. Ct. 1243206 L. Ed. 2d 240·Supreme Court of the United States·2020
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sunil DEO, Petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 19-692
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb. 24, 2020
Motion of California Land Title Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.