Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fannie R. Taylor, Appellant, v. Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company of Cham, Switzerland, Respondent, 1900 — 165 N.Y. 611 · caselaw · US
General
Fannie R. Taylor, Appellant, v. Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company of Cham, Switzerland, Respondent
165 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fannie R. Taylor, Appellant, v. Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company of Cham, Switzerland, Respondent.
Taylor v. Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Co., 53 App. Div. 640, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted November 26, 1900;
decided December 4, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department entered July 25,1900, affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate an order directing the plaintiff to appear before a person named for personal and physical examination.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the order from which the appeal is taken is not appealable to the Court of Appeals.
Vanamee & Vail for motion.
Thomas Watts opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.