Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick Reichert, Respondent, v. Charlotte M. Stilwell, as Administratrix of Charles A. Stilwell, Deceased, et al., Appellants, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick Reichert, Respondent, v. Charlotte M. Stilwell, as Administratrix of Charles A. Stilwell, Deceased, et al., Appellants
172 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Reichert, Respondent, v. Charlotte M. Stilwell, as Administratrix of Charles A. Stilwell, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
(Submitted November 10, 1902;
decided November 18, 1902.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 172 N. Y. 83.)
Motion granted and remittitur to have inserted in it the words “ against Charlotte M. Stilwell, as administratrix of the goods, chattels and credits of Charles A. Stilwell, deceased.”