Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carolene Products Co. v. Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., 1939 — 307 U.S. 612 · caselaw · US
General
Carolene Products Co. v. Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.
307 U.S. 612·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 902.
Carolene Products Co. v. Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.
Decided May 22, 1939.
Messrs. Frank K. Nebeker and George N. Murdock for appellant. Solicitor General Jackson for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to affirm is granted and the order denying a temporary injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Commn, 278 U. S. 322, 326-327; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338.