Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schenley Distillers, Inc., et al. v. Bingler, District Director of Internal Revenue, 1957 — 353 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Schenley Distillers, Inc., et al. v. Bingler, District Director of Internal Revenue
353 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 775.
Schenley Distillers, Inc., et al. v. Bingler, District Director of Internal Revenue.
Elder W. Marshall for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Hilbert P. Zarky and Melva M. Graney for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.