General
The Skaneateles Paper Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Syracuse
201 U.S. 642·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 69.
The Skaneateles Paper Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Syracuse.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Argued for plaintiffs in error April 10, 1906.
Decided April 16, 1906.
Mr. Martin Conboy, Mr. John W. Griggs, Mr. Arthur J. Baldwin and Mr. Charles W. Tooke for plaintiffs in error. ■
Mr. Charles L. Stone and Mr. Walter W. Magee for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Chicago &c. Railway Company v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128; Scudder v. Comptroller of New York, 175 U. S. 32; Eastern Building &c. Association v. Welling, 181 U. S. 47.