Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. State of New York; and State of New York v. United States, 1941 — 314 U.S. 592 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. State of New York; and State of New York v. United States
314 U.S. 592·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 238.
No. 251.
United States v. State of New York; and State of New York v. United States.
Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, Richard H. Demuth, and Michael H. Cardozo, IV, for the United States. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General, and Henry ■Epstein, Solicitor General, for the State of New York.
October 13, 1941.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
Reported below: 118 F. 2d 537.