Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Avila et al. v. United States; Bell v. United States; Harden v. United States; Baskin v. United States; Battiste v. United States; Downs v. United States; Denmark v. United States; Daniels v. United States; Crumbly v. United States; Lamar v. United States; Johnson v. United States; Lloyd v. United States; Jenkins v. United States; Scott v. United States; Sullivan v. United States; Smith v. United States; Stilling, aka Stillings v. United States; Smith v. United States; Knight v. United States; Jelks v. United States; Mills v. United States; McGraw v. United States; Murphy v. United States; Bell v. United States; Moore v. United States; Bellott v. United States; Mann v. United States; and Singletary v. United States, 2013 — 568 U.S. 1100 · caselaw · US