Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEWIS, HUBBARD & COMPANY, a Corporation, and Brown Milling & Produce Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. Lee H. HENKEL, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Grant THOMAS, Bankrupt, Appellee, 1926 — 15 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
Corporations
LEWIS, HUBBARD & COMPANY, a Corporation, and Brown Milling & Produce Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. Lee H. HENKEL, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Grant THOMAS, Bankrupt, Appellee
15 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEWIS, HUBBARD & COMPANY, a Corporation, and Brown Milling & Produce Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. Lee H. HENKEL, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Grant THOMAS, Bankrupt, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 18, 1926.)
No. 2562.
Appeal from the District Court of the' United States for the Southern District of' West Virginia, at Charleston, in Bankruptcy; George W. McClintic, Judge.
Howard N. Luckey, of .Charleston, W. Va., for appellants.
Alvin J. Barnhart, of Charleston, W. Va.,. for appellee.
Before ROSE and PARKER, Circuit. Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
What the appellants say they did demonstrates that, when they obtained their preferences, th’ey knew the bankrupt was insolvent. The allegations and proofs, sustain the equity jurisdiction of the court-below.
Affirmed.