Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ex parte STATE of OKLAHOMA, 1930 — 45 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
Ex parte STATE of OKLAHOMA
45 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1930
Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and Mc-DERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ex parte STATE of OKLAHOMA.
No. 376.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 1930.
See, also, 37 F.(2d) 862.
R. W. Stontz, of Tulsa, OH., and Ed. W. Clark, of Pawnee, Okl., for petitioner.
Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and Mc-DERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Peremptory writ of mandamus issued October 25, 1930.