Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Harvey et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al.; Thompson v. Woltenberg; Nieves v. United States; Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas, et al. v. McCluskey, by his Next Friend, McCluskey; Hunt v. Collins; Dykema et al. v. United States et al.; Fiala v. Village of Carpentersville; Yeo v. Michigan; Ruppel v. United States; Berger v. United States et al.; Niemi v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., et al.; Brewer v. Indiana; Hyman v. South Carolina; Maselli v. State Board of Equalization of California; Paschal v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission et al.; Black v. East Ohio Gas Co. et al.; Harrington v. Tennessee; Hoover v. Mississippi; Ritter v. Ritter; Neustein v. United States; United States ex rel. Miller v. McCarthy, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, et al., 1982 — 458 U.S. 1132 · caselaw · US