Tax
Roger MORTON et al., as Executors, etc., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
61 F.2d 1036·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Roger MORTON et al., as Executors, etc., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 57.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1932.
Valentine B. Havens and Chas. B. Meln-nis, both of New York City, for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key .and Paul D. Miller, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. .(,C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Liternal Revenue, and L. H. Rushbrook, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondents.
Before. MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed in open court.