Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oliver Williams, Respondent, v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Appellant, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 518 · caselaw · US
General
Oliver Williams, Respondent, v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Appellant
183 N.Y. 518·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Oliver Williams, Respondent, v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Appellant.
(Argued October 23, 1905;
decided November 21, 1905.)
Williams v. Central R. R. Co. of New Jersey, 93 App. Div. 582, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 4,1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for á new trial.
Robert Thorne for appellant.
Robert L. Luce and Frederick A. Blount for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment'affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.