Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LOCAL NO. 65 OF AMALGAMATED SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE et al., v. Joseph D. FACKENTHAL, Ancillary Receiver for the Central Metal Products Corporation and the United Metal Products Company, 1929 — 41 F.2d 1005 · caselaw · US
Corporations
LOCAL NO. 65 OF AMALGAMATED SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE et al., v. Joseph D. FACKENTHAL, Ancillary Receiver for the Central Metal Products Corporation and the United Metal Products Company
41 F.2d 1005·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LOCAL NO. 65 OF AMALGAMATED SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE et al., v. Joseph D. FACKENTHAL, Ancillary Receiver for the Central Metal Products Corporation and the United Metal Products Company.
No. 5232.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 13, 1929.
J. Paul Thompson, of Cleveland, Ohio, and William G. Pickrel, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellants.
Stanley & Horwitz, of Cleveland, Ohio, J. E. Mathews, of Cleveland, Ohio, and W. G.Merritt, of New York City, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed upon authorities cited in opinion of District Judge.