Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brady, Administratrix, v. Southern Railway Co., 1943 — 319 U.S. 777 · caselaw · US
General
Brady, Administratrix, v. Southern Railway Co.
319 U.S. 777·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 830.
Brady, Administratrix, v. Southern Railway Co.
May 3, 1943.
[MAJORITY]
It appearing that the judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is a final judgment in view of the decisions of that Court called to our attention by the petition for rehearing, Tussey v. Owen, 147 N. C. 335, 337, 61 S. E. 180; Hollingsworth v. Skelding, 142 N. C. 246, 253, 55 S. E. 212, the petition for rehearing is granted and the order denying a writ of certiorari, 318 U. S. 792, is vacated. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina is granted.
Mr. Julius C. Smith for petitioner. Messrs. Russell M. Robinson and S. R. Prince for respondent.