Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hermon L. Ensign, Respondent, v. Frederick Tracy Nelson, Appellant, 1889 — 112 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
Hermon L. Ensign, Respondent, v. Frederick Tracy Nelson, Appellant
112 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hermon L. Ensign, Respondent, v. Frederick Tracy Nelson, Appellant.
(Argued January 29, 1889;
decided February 8, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 19, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant to vacate an order of arrest, and also affirmed .an order of Special Term granting a motion by plaintiff to submit the complaint herein as part of the papers in opposition to defendant’s said motion.
George W. Blunt for appellant.
Sumner B. Stiles for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.