Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John M. Jones et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Morgan Jones, Deceased, Respondents, v. Hannah R. Rockwell et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 566 · caselaw · US
General
John M. Jones et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Morgan Jones, Deceased, Respondents, v. Hannah R. Rockwell et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
182 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John M. Jones et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Morgan Jones, Deceased, Respondents, v. Hannah R. Rockwell et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
(Argued October 6, 1905;
decided October 24, 1905.)
Jones v. Rockwell, 97 App. Div. 639 affirmed.
Appeal from á judgment of the Appellate Division- of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 2, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Peter A. Hendrick and Henry M. T. Beekman for appellants.
Richard, T. Greene and John M. Jones for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien. J.