Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES, 1969 — 394 U.S. 454 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES
394 U.S. 454·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES.
No. 880.
Decided April 1, 1969.
Gregory S. Stout for petitioner.
Solicitor General Grisioold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kossack, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, ante, p. 165.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.