Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George A. ADAMOS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO., Appellee, 1934 — 71 F.2d 997 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George A. ADAMOS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO., Appellee
71 F.2d 997·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George A. ADAMOS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO., Appellee.
No. 5436.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
July 10, 1934.
John D. Meyer and Alan S. Christner, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
William H. Eckert, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Louis H. Cooke, of New York City, and Smith, Buchanan, Scott & Gordon, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In this ease the beneficiary of four policies issued by the New York Life Insurance Company on the life of Andy Adamos brought suit to recover thereon. In answer thereto the insurance company, in pursuance of section 274b of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 398), and in accord with Enelow v. New York Life Insurance Co. (C. C. A.) 70 F.(2d) 728, prayed equitable relief by canceling the policies in question on the ground of fraud. After testimony was taken, the court found the decedent guilty of the alleged fraud, in that in his application for insurance he had falsely stated that he had not been treated by any doctors, whereas, in point of fact, by his own admission, he had been under the care of several, and had been informed that he was suffering from probably fatal maladies.
After hearing and due consideration had, we agree with the court below and find it had ample testimony on which to base its finding that a fraud had been committed.
The judgment below is therefore affirmed.