Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. et al. v. UNITED STATES, 1961 — 365 U.S. 567 · caselaw · US
General
JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. et al. v. UNITED STATES
365 U.S. 567·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 631.
Decided March 20, 1961.
Israel Packel for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Points 1 and 3, Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U. S. 1; International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U. S. 392. Points 2 and 6, United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U. S. 629, 633. Point 4, Schine Theatres v. United States, 334 U. S. 110, 119.