Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
North Chicago et al. v. The Maccabees, a Corporation, et al.; and The Maccabees, a Corporation, v. North Chicago et al., 1942 — 317 U.S. 598 · caselaw · US
Corporations
North Chicago et al. v. The Maccabees, a Corporation, et al.; and The Maccabees, a Corporation, v. North Chicago et al.
317 U.S. 598·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75.
North Chicago et al. v. The Maccabees, a Corporation, et al.; and The Maccabees, a Corporation, v. North Chicago et al.
No. 96.
November 23, 1942.
Messrs. Lionel A. Mincer and Frank T. O’Brien for petitioners in No. 75 and respondents in No. 96. Messrs. Edward J. Jeffries, Jr. and David A. Hersh for respondents in No. 75 and petitioner in No. 96.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to withdraw the petition for certiorari in No. 96 is granted and the petition is dismissed. The motion of The Maccabees to withdraw all papers previously filed on their behalf in No. 75 is granted. All motions made by Arvid B. Tanner on his own behalf are denied. The motion to substitute counsel is granted and the appearance of Arvid B. Tanner is ordered withdrawn.