Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anton Nowak, Appellant, v. George F. Waller et al., Respondents, 1892 — 132 N.Y. 590 · caselaw · US
General
Anton Nowak, Appellant, v. George F. Waller et al., Respondents
132 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anton Nowak, Appellant, v. George F. Waller et al., Respondents.
{Submitted March 11, 1892;
decided March 25, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 12, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor ■of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John R. Reid for appellant.
Timothy M. Oriffing and Wilmot M. Smith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.