Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ann M. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Nelson Terry, Appellant, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Ann M. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Nelson Terry, Appellant
166 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ann M. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Nelson Terry, Appellant.
Smith v. Terry, 38 App. Div. 394, affirmed.
(Argued April 2, 1901;
decided April 23, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court .in the second judicial department, made March 7, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, and granting a new trial.
Horace Secor, Jr., for appellant.
A. N. Weller and George Wallace for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs, oii opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.