Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank D. Zell, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1906 — 203 U.S. 577 · caselaw · US
General
Frank D. Zell, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia
203 U.S. 577·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 297.
Frank D. Zell, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Motions to dismiss or affirm, etc., submitted May 21, 1906.
Decided October 15, 1906.
Mr. Charles L. Frailey, Mr. Reynolds D. Brown, Mr. Malcolm Lloyd, Jr., Mr. A. S. Worthington and Mr. Charles É. Burr for plaintiff in error. Mr. D. Lawrence Groner, Mr. Tazewell Taylor and Mr. Hampton L. Carson for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Per Curiam.
Order affirmed with costs.