Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OVERPECK LAND CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK, West Shore Railroad Company, et al., 1931 — 51 F.2d 1082 · caselaw · US
Corporations
OVERPECK LAND CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK, West Shore Railroad Company, et al.
51 F.2d 1082·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OVERPECK LAND CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK, West Shore Railroad Company, et al.
No. 4548.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Aug. 19, 1931.
Donald M. Waesche, of Ridgefield Park, N. J. (Mark A. Sullivan, of Jersey City, N. J., of counsel), for appellants.
Wm. J. Morrison, Jr., and Morrison, Lloyd & Morrison, all of Hackensack, N. J., for appellee Village of Ridgefield Park.
Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, of Jersey City, N. J., for appellees West Shore R. Co., and another.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment [43 F.(2d) 597] entered by the trial judge sitting without a jury for the defendants in an ejectment suit. Every substantial question raised here was raised in the District Court and correctly decided there, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned District Judge.
Affirmed.