Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Watson et al., Respondents, v. John E. Chilberg et al., Appellants, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 550 · caselaw · US
General
William Watson et al., Respondents, v. John E. Chilberg et al., Appellants
192 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Watson et al., Respondents, v. John E. Chilberg et al., Appellants.
Watson v. Chilberg, 116 App. Div. 914, affirmed.
(Argued April 13, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 15, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover on a bill of exchange.
Dean Emery for appellants.
John A. Garver for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.