Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York et al.
334 U.S. 831·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 303,
Misc.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Leonard J. Emmerglick, Robert L. Stern, Kenneth L. Kimble and Horace H. Robbins for the United States.
United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York et al.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.