Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Enos G. Laney, as Administrator, etc., 1890 — 119 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Enos G. Laney, as Administrator, etc.
119 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Enos G. Laney, as Administrator, etc.
(Argued December 10, 1889 ;
decided January 14, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Tuesday of June, 1888, which modified and .affirmed as modified a decree of the surrogate of Monroe county, upon the accounting of Enos G. Laney, as one of the administrators of James Laney, deceased.
Quincy Van Voorhis and Frank M. Goff for appellants.
Theodore Bacon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.