Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac B. Miller, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Downing, Appellant, 1873 — 54 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Isaac B. Miller, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Downing, Appellant
54 N.Y. 631·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac B. Miller, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Downing, Appellant.
(Argued January 26, 1873;
decided March term, 1873.)
This was an action of ejectment to recover possession of a piece of land in East Hampton, Suffolk county. Defendant had been in possession several years; prior to that it had been a common. Defendant claimed under a deed from John Merry to defendant’s ancestor, given in 1737. Plaintiff claimed under a deed from Gardiner Miller, given 1833. There was no evidence that said grantor ever had possession. Plaintiff’s claim of possession rested upon the fact that he was accustomed to have a wood pile on the vacant lot for some thirty years, and had buried potatoes upon it for six years. No evidence was given of a claim of title by him until this suit was brought. Held, that plaintiff failed to make out a title, and had acquired none by adverse possession, and was not entitled to recover.
George Miller for the appellant.
J. la/wrence Smith for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Reynolds, C.]
Reynolds, C.
reads for reversal.
All concur; Lott, Ch. C., not sitting.
Judgment reversed.