General
Isaac E. Chapman and William L. Chapman, Appellants, v. L. E. Waterman Company, Respondent
138 A.D. 897·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1910·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac E. Chapman and William L. Chapman, Appellants, v. L. E. Waterman Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office March 21, 1910, denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Without passing upon the right of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction, we think, upon the record as it stands, that the court was justified in refusing to grant a temporary injunction, leaving it to the court upon the trial to give such judgment as the evidence would justify. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.