Contracts · MBE-tested
E. E. WILEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
75 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
E. E. WILEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 7565.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 25, 1935.
Emmett Doherty, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Ernest R. Utley, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal.
Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
Writ of certiorari denied 55 S. Ct. 657, 79 L. Ed. —.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After oral argument, and upon consideration of briefs filed, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court in this cause be, and hereby is, affirmed upon the authority of Meadows v. U. S., 11 F.(2d) 718; Prussian v. U. S., 282 U. S. 675, 51 S. Ct. 223, 75 L. Ed. 610, and Mosheik v. U. S., 63 F.(2d) 533.