General
In the Matter of the City of New York, Appellant-Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of East River Drive, and Approaches Thereto, in the Borough of Manhattan. Guy Cary et al., as Ancillary Executors of Robert W. Goelet, et al., Respondents-Appellants; George V. R. J. Innes-Ker, Respondent
273 A.D. 884·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1948·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the City of New York, Appellant-Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of East River Drive, and Approaches Thereto, in the Borough of Manhattan. Guy Cary et al., as Ancillary Executors of Robert W. Goelet, et al., Respondents-Appellants; George V. R. J. Innes-Ker, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supplemental and amended final decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, George Victor Robert John Innes-Ker, Duke of Roxburghe, against the City of New York. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.