Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. United States et al., 1955 — 350 U.S. 892 · caselaw · US
General
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. United States et al.
350 U.S. 892·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 400.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Joseph H. Hays, Amos M. Mathews and Carl Helmetag, Jr. for appellants. Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Floyd F. Shields, Ernest L. Rushmer and Arthur D. Condon for the Fruehauf Trailer Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.