Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States et al. v. Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co. et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 824 · caselaw · US
General
United States et al. v. Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co. et al.
355 U.S. 824·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 220.
United States et al. v. Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co. et al.
Attorney General Brownell, Acting Assistant Attorney General Stull and Harry Baum for petitioners. William M. Fulcher for the Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co., Charles D. Turner for the Reliance Clay Products Co., William S. Pritchard and Winston B. McCall for the Estate of Stephenson et al., William A. Sutherland for the Tupelo Brick & Tile Co. et al., Harry C. Weeks, Benjamin L. Bird and Joseph B. Brennan for the Acme Brick Co., Franklin Spafford for Kirby et al., Charles J. Bloch and Mr. Brennan for the Cherokee Brick & Tile Co., Fur-man Smith for the Chattahoochee Brick Co., Allen Post for the Atlanta Brick & Tile Co., Wallace Miller, Jr. for the Burns Brick Co., and Howard P. Travis for the Texas Vitrified Pipe Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.